Not as such, but any community that has a public transit system powered by electricity is representative of what can be done under an integrated urban energy system. If it's in Vancouver, or if it's in Toronto or Calgary, for that matter, wherever you have electrified rail and electrified transit, that is an example.
What I was suggesting was more along these lines. The way we do it now is we build our communities according to some prescribed processes and then we hand that over to the transportation authorities to figure out how wide to make the roads and how to service the expected level of mobility that comes with that. A better approach would be for the transportation planners, the builders, and the local energy distribution companies to come together to figure out a system that might work in an optimal fashion.
Again, if you're hooking your block of homes up to natural gas, you might be able to produce heat and power for your home, and that power might enable a certain amount of private electric vehicle use, or it might also be able to feed to the local electric bus grid. All of these things are examples.
The one example I would point out is in Victoria at Dockside Green. It doesn't have the transportation component that your question leads towards, but it does represent the efficient use of energy, waste water, and so forth.