Mr. Cullen, I appreciate your remarks, but how I characterize or don't characterize the situation is not as important as how I deal with the situation. Dealing with the situation means that we increase the global supply of isotopes and we manage the supply. What we call it is going to be a difference of opinion between you and me, but what's important is that we work on it and that we work on it together.
With respect to the NRU, you indicated that there have been a litany of problems. That is simply not the case. I think we should be very careful about the facts we present to committee, knowing there's a difference of opinion.
We are concerned as well for people who aren't able to have the medical isotope tests they'd like to have right away, and that's why we're working on it.
The last point I'd like to make, Mr. Cullen, is that it's quite counterintuitive for you to indicate that the other reactors in the world aren't sufficient for our supply, when Canada notably supplied 60% of the world for a long period of time. If it was good enough to go that way, it's fine enough to come back to us. Any increase worldwide, I believe, is an incredible benefit for us, and we're working together with our colleagues on that matter.