Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
I'm very curious about this as well. With the explanation as you read it, it wasn't really clear.
I didn't understand or follow quite what the objection is, precisely, and I would like to know from the department what the situation is in relation to a parts manufacturer, or whatever, and why they wouldn't be... Is this partly because of the strict liability that applies to the operator? What's the idea here?
I would like to have the answer to that, but I understand that you may make a ruling that--