If Bill C-20 is not an act meant to address the event of a severe accident, and we're now on the compensable damage clauses, why is that not inferred in the act?
On November 25th, 2009. See this statement in context.
On November 25th, 2009. See this statement in context.
November 25th, 2009 / 3:35 p.m.
NDP
Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC
If Bill C-20 is not an act meant to address the event of a severe accident, and we're now on the compensable damage clauses, why is that not inferred in the act?
See context to find out what was said next.