Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I find this willingness to sit down and find a solution with industry representatives and environmentalists quite positive. It is wonderful.
At times, there has been not so much a contradiction as much as an imbalance in everything you have said so far. On the one hand, you said that what the government decided to do was very clever. But, on the other hand, you said that, in comparison with our biggest competitor, the United States, the government did not do enough.
How could we have been clever while, at the same time, doing enough to offset what was happening? How much would that be investment-wise? In your expert opinion, how can we do that without having a slew of complaints on our hands because of the lumber agreements? There has to be a way to find a balance.