Sure. Thank you very much.
In terms of the total number of communities engaged in the application of integrated community solutions, our hope is to have all of them, and there are 5,400 across Canada. The intent, though, is that you could assume that every major city over 50,000, say, is trying something in some regard.
We are documenting at this time, with support from Natural Resources Canada, how many communities are actually doing integrated community solutions on some scale. Right now, we have 65 to 75 that we've just pulled together, but it all depends on how you define them.
When you start looking at northern and remote communities, you see that their challenges in terms of energy are the same. They need electricity and they need heat. In terms of what they rely on primarily for electricity, of course, it's diesel; there are 300 off-grid communities. At the same time, they might also require other types of fuel—oil for heating, maybe—and what they're looking at is that the prices and costs are of course escalating, particularly as they have to fly it in. What we're looking at in the hope of encouraging it is what could be done locally. Could they be looking at alternative sources of energy that might be there already, whether that's biomass or others?
We have a couple of communities to highlight. Beaverlodge is one. High Level is one. These examples are communities in Alberta; they wouldn't be so much remote or northern. They are communities that are still on the grid, but they're looking at combined heat and power, as examples, and at drawing on local biomass sources for what they could be doing to offset their activities. When we start looking even further, up into the Northwest Territories, Yukon, and Nunavut, they get into creatively different challenges.
Mike, would you like to add anything?