I think I would say that I, like you and hopefully most Canadians, believe that the board, with their expertise and their reviews, is in the business of ensuring that risky projects don't go forward. So should and when a project proposal come forward for drilling in the Arctic, which may or may not occur sometime in the near future, the board will evaluate those projects. They'll have public consultations. They will hold the companies accountable for demonstrating how they plan to deal with incidents, should they occur, including the short drilling season that exists in the north and the standing requirement for a relief well, which remains part of the National Energy Board's requirements.
I'd hope, first off, that risky projects don't go forward. I'd hope that the review projects under the board continue to evaluate projects, as they do today; that there is an appropriate discussion among stakeholders, and that the first nation communities, aboriginal communities, and Inuit and northern communities who would be most affected and impacted would contribute to those discussions; that the board would make a determination independently, based on the science and the evidence, of whether the project should proceed; that, if it should, the board would determine whether or not the financial capacity requirements should be higher than the minimum $1 billion, which is what's required in the legislation once this bill passes, should it pass.