Mr. Rafferty and I have some history. I was the deputy minister in Ontario when they started the tenure reform process.
I think there is a willingness and an understanding that making fibre available for new and innovative uses has to be part of our conversation. However, it is the classic Canadian challenge that the tenure system is the responsibility of the provinces and they need to make their decisions on what's in the best interests of the people on the landscape, the people who are creating the jobs, and the communities that they want to serve.
I know Quebec has moved forward with some tenure reform there. It's challenging but they're making progress. Ontario has done a number of things with individual forest FMAs, forest management agreements, and forest management plans, to pursue tenure reform. It is happening in different parts of the country at different paces and to different degrees. More community involvement and more involvement of first nations is always a subtext when you look at tenure reform. It's not a simple plug-and-play, take out an old system and put in a new system. Companies make decisions based on 20-year investments and to suddenly change a system after they've made a 20-year investment would not be good business and it wouldn't be good public policy either. I think we need to evolve our system but respect that business decisions rely on certainty and stability.