No, it's not any different from most pieces of legislation that establish authorities to provide regulations. Generally speaking, without being entirely disingenuous to Parliament, legislation doesn't get changed very often, and it takes a great deal of activity and attention from parliamentarians, whereas the regulation- making function tends to be a little more responsive to changes that happen in time and over changes in society. Making regulations are equally applicable under the law and equally important, so in no way is the regulation-making function a denigration of an attempt to ensure pipelines are safe, or to ensure that certain things don't happen in a specific way.
Certainly, there's been a fair bit of comment about how the government may or may not choose to do things, and I respect the comment. I'd suggest that certainly in the regulation-making activity there's a fairly broad and extensive public consultation period. Any Canadian and any group or association has the ability to write in and certainly contribute in a public way to the regulation that's being proposed, and the government has an obligation and a duty to respond to that. I would expect we would do that for all the elements that are laid out in this bill.