I think the purpose behind the notion of the tribunal is to provide for in the circumstance that a company is not accepting its responsibility or is unwilling to do so. In the case of the incidents that exist as in the record I pointed out—whatever it was, 6.7 or 7 incidents—companies have cleaned up the damage and have dealt with damages with individuals who were impacted and there is no requirement for a tribunal to exist. Should there be a difference of opinion on those things, certainly the individuals impacted have the court system to manage anything they wish to pursue.
The notion of the tribunal is in the notion of something that's out of the ordinary and something that I think is deemed to be significant, which would perhaps be the way to look at it, as opposed to creating an administrative tribunal to deal with something that is being dealt with on a civil basis, if you can put it that way.