I'm not sure that answered the full question, Mr. Minister, and I will say that your recollection of what happened at that meeting and mine are two different things, because there is definitely not even unanimity among IEA members about what we need to focus on at this point in time. As a matter of fact, I think the Czech Republic actually said it is time for us to put aside the current emergency for what is their emergency in Europe right now, which is their very existence. Now, I know we have to balance these things in perspective, but this perspective has to be looked at going forward, and we have to balance what we do for the world here, because the world has continued to grow its energy consumption and we've been on the sidelines. Committing to the equivalent of 300,000 barrels a day over the next year potentially is a pittance, first of all, and we can't even get that oil to tidewater because we don't have the infrastructure. I'm going to say right here that this represents a failure by this government and by our country, and we're still importing over one million barrels a day, whose production we don't carbon-cost. These are flaws in your approach.
I'm going to ask you this. When you look at the actual production of oil around the world and the representation Canada has in that, we rank pretty high—up with Norway as far as our transparency and our ESG characteristics with respect to oil production go. Are you suggesting that we displace that Canadian oil with offshore oil both in Canada and in the growing markets around the world, particularly in the world's poorest markets?