The link is quite simple, sir: They are linked because they aim to reduce emissions in your industry. You're trying to use carbon capture strategies to achieve net zero by 2050. The clean fuel regulations seek to reduce emissions in your sector.
Why, on the one hand, would you reject a solution that costs you less, namely the clean fuel regulations, but on the other, choose a solution devoting 10% of your capital expenditures to reducing your carbon footprint? I don't understand that. I see the impact of implementing carbon capture strategies on your production costs as exponential and very high. That makes sense to you, but the clean fuel regulations make no sense to you.
I beg your pardon for what I said to you earlier, but—