I suppose I should start on the point of order.
I think that my discussion has constantly been on.... I've worked it around and talked about how we as individual MPs have to look at what is happening in our surroundings. I believe that was the point I was making.
I will attempt to keep to relevance. However, on my statement about the moratorium on renewables the comment back to me was, I believe, a point of debate. Once it went to that level when the suggestion was, “Oh, but what is this item?”, as far as relevance is concerned I believe that is when we moved to debate. As I mentioned earlier, I believe that is when there should be a case of shutting down that discussion because now it has brought back in this next level of debate, to which I had no intention of going, but it does bring that into the discussion.
That is the end of my point of order.