Out of friendship for Mr. Patzer, I can rise on a point of order to help him.
In his comments, he speaks at length about the environmental impact bills. I'd simply like to point out to him that one of Quebec's major liquefied natural gas projects was turned down because of an environmental assessment carried out by Quebec. If we were to review every single environmental assessment, I don't think that that would necessarily lead to all kinds of agreements on gas and oil projects.
It's clear that Quebec doesn't want any liquefied natural gas projects. If Mr. Patzer's goal is to give the provinces more sovereignty over environmental assessments, then I fully agree with him. But I don't think that's his intent.
So I'd like some clarification from him on that matter.