First of all, we're doing a clause-by-clause and not a general debate, but beyond that, it's unparliamentary to be saying that the minister has “misled” this committee. At this point we're not taking further evidence on this, and I hear the person across speaking about intentional misleading. None of that is the way we should be discussing this in clause-by-clause.
On February 26th, 2024. See this statement in context.