Mr. Chair, before Mr. Patzer moves his motion, I have a question about the Standing Orders.
I gather from the Standing Orders that, during clause‑by‑clause consideration of a bill, a motion can't be moved unless it relates specifically to a clause of the bill. Mr. Patzer must be able to show that his motion relates specifically to a clause of the bill. If he can't, technically, he shouldn't be able to move his motion.
Can anyone clarify this for me?