I hope I'm in the right spot. On page 38, proposed paragraph 138.011(2)(b) says, “the Minister of the Environment has issued a decision statement under section 65 of that Act.” It's one thing to talk about the unconstitutionality of it, but here we're also putting into the bill a direction from a minister that speaks to section 65 of the act. A lot of the act was considered unconstitutional. I'm assuming this is as well.
The discussion we had earlier was about how we're going to fix all of this later and not to worry about it. Is that also the remedy that we suggest is going to come about for proposed paragraph 138.011(2)(b), which speaks about the role of the Minister of Environment?