I would like to add something to that answer. The common framework enables those who teach French as a second language to use the same kind of terminology to describe the skills acquired by young learners.
There is no such framework now. In fact, everyone uses their own language in terms of their learning outcomes, in their curriculum and their province. The framework would help standardize the language used in terms of success.
That would also mean a change in philosophy for curriculum materials. Currently, greater emphasis is placed on what young Canadians are learning and on what their second-language abilities are. That also dictates the teaching method by making it more focused on students and on how well they can speak, read and think in their second language. That is why this approach is important.