In the presentation of the amendment, I'm having difficulty understanding how it changes the character of the motion before us. In presenting it, the member of the third party didn't really clarify to members of the committee what substantive changes it's going to bring and what the intent of the amendment is. In regard to understanding why this amendment is being made to the motion, I have difficulty with the lack of clarification by Madam St-Denis.
I have problems with the motion itself as moved by the government, which I will discuss when we get to the main motion. I share concerns that are similar to those of my colleague, Monsieur Godin, in terms of how this might exclude certain members of Parliament who do not have an official party affiliation. I'm worried that this exclusion will threaten the privilege of those members to act as full members of Parliament.
As you know, Chair, committees aren't accountable to political parties. They're accountable to Parliament. I think we're starting to move in a direction that's a little bit dangerous. I'm willing to discuss this more and at length when we consider the main motion. I hope the government will give us the opportunity to debate this fully.
I would just like a clarification from Madam St-Denis on what the intent of her amendment is.