If I've understood correctly, the ruling is fairly specific about damages during international flights. It's the convergence or contradiction between the Official Languages Act and the Montreal Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Carriages By Air.
If I've understood correctly, the 120-page ruling is based on international jurisprudence. It was decided that, in the case of international flights, the court does not have the authority to award damages because of the Montreal convention, which is an international convention.
I do not want to invent a capacity for my office, the government or the court to legislate in a context of international jurisprudence. It would be an inappropriate improvisation on my part.