I am also in favour of the motion.
It doesn't matter to me if we spend less time on the 2008-2013 roadmap, as Mr. Généreux said, since it has already been analyzed. We could do that part more quickly. However, I would like us to set a time limit on that study. We don't need to spend a year on that. That is what Mr. Généreux was trying to say, I think. We have to give ourselves a limit. Perhaps Mr. Vandal could give us some idea of the time limit he would like to put on the motion.
I would like to make an aside, quickly.
I know we had planned to have Ms. Achimov return to the committee to talk to us about the Translation Bureau. At the last meeting, we said this was not necessary. However, I was wondering if we could receive Minister Judy Foote or some officials from the Department of Public Services and Procurement, since that is the department responsible for the Translation Bureau. It would be interesting to hear from one or all of these officials. I know it might be difficult to have the minister come here, but perhaps we could hear from some executives to find out what is being planned for the Translation Bureau. That is what I am proposing, but I will speak about it again later. I just wanted to float the idea.