Thank you for your observation.
In your brief, you also said that there was an inequality in the designation of language requirements for positions, and you talked about professional problems. I'm not sure I understand your sentence. I may have misinterpreted it.
What should be done about designating language requirements? We've seen a lot of problems in this regard. Sometimes, some positions don't even require bilingualism. So what should be done about it? My question can be for both witnesses.
As we can see, we accept people who don't speak French in bilingual positions, with the promise that French training will be taken. Sometimes the training doesn't produce very good results; sometimes it produces fairly good results, but, if the person doesn't practise speaking French, they revert to English.