The reason why I raise this, and I mentioned this in earlier testimony, is that there is an availability that if someone, an individual, finds that they're being discriminated against for gender, for any of the things under the Canadian Human Rights Act, they can deal with that through various means, the ultimate of which would be to take it to the tribunal. That's still within there.
To me, I think it's eminently reasonable to say that if someone, one of your members, had seen it and said, “There is a case here for pay equity discrimination” that you as the union could take that on for the membership in general. Is that not correct?