I concur with that as well. That one has always been a source of some frustration to me.
I think the cause of it arising today, after it came out a couple of days ago, is the inadvertence of those of us who sit on the procedure and House affairs committee, as we simply look at how we can deal with it quickly. Is there space available where we don't have a meeting and can take the time that procedure and House affairs normally uses for the meeting? I think we've been basing it on our own convenience rather than ensuring there is a proper review.
I take partial responsibility for that and share it with everybody else on that committee. I think that's probably where the fault lies as much as anywhere else. If we establish the practice of giving ourselves a decent amount of time, that would be a first step anyway.