If I understand correctly—and you can correct me if am wrong about what you just said, Mr. Toone—you're saying that effectively, certain of the treaty rights that are constitutionally entrenched via section 35 of the Constitution Act of 1982 are effectively repealed by virtue of certain sections of this act. I'm just trying to figure out now which....
There are certain obligations placed upon the bands that in some respects would cause a retrenchment of those treaties. Is that sort of what you're getting at, or am I missing the point?