The report also says that, when the second contract was awarded in 2004, two companies had submitted bids. One of them won the contract, but the contract was cancelled afterwards. That same company bid the second time around. The other company asked what percentage of the contract involved real estate management. The answer was that this aspect accounted for 60% of all the transactions. In fact—and Ms. Fraser indicates this in her report—it was not 60%, but 0.22%.
I would like to know how that figure could be out by more than 59%. The result was that one of the two companies bid $48 million or $50 million higher than the other. Of course, when we are talking about $48 million, it is clear that the situation was not very fair. The company that already had the contract knew the real figures. Why is it that those figures were not provided to the other company?