I'm going to try to put this in perspective. We started on this inquiry based on the Auditor General's report about some serious issues surrounding the pension insurance administration. We've spent the last two or three months trying to grapple with what went wrong and what the issues were to get a clear picture of it.
I find it personally troubling at this stage of the game, after we've had basically full disclosure before this committee, to have quotations presented to the committee that present pretty relevant and cogent evidence about things that are relevant to our inquiry without knowing who said these thingsāno hint about who said them. The four w's in an inquiry are who, when, why, and where. We're leaving a lot out of the equation.
I find it troubling to proceed without knowing the source of this information. We're deviating here if we say we're not going to ask for names, because we've been doing it all along. I'm sorry, but I'm a bit puzzled by the position we seem to be taking here. The invisible person is going to be involved in this from here on in, with quotes being attributed left, right, and centre. We're going to have invisible men and women, and nobody seems to know where they came from or where they fit into the picture.