However, the point stands, and the Auditor General's comment is valid that when you know that a structure will be requiring additional security measures, they should implement those from the start so that you don't end up with a situation like the one we've had, in which there have been extra costs, and the plans have been found on Bank Street.
Incidentally, I'm told that those plans are much more detailed than just the shell. They include schematics for wiring and so forth. So one would imagine that if Trenton needs some security requirements, they will have to do that, and they will incur extra costs.
Will we know that in the review you're expecting at the end of this month, Mr. Fonberg? Will that review be shared with the committee?