I would just conclude through the use of deductive reasoning. We have three allegations. You've decided not to pursue the first and the third. The second involves testimony before a parliamentary committee, which you are not allowed to use in your proceedings according to our own Speaker in a letter to you. Therefore, the responsibility rests with us to determine whether she is in contempt. It is the responsibility of parliamentarians now to do our job in determining her comportment before this committee. It is beyond the scope of the law for you to make that determination for us.
Is that your understanding?