Nothing Mr. Holland is saying is even admissible with the RCMP. None of that testimony can even be considered in disciplinary proceedings against any of its employees, because it is entirely immune. I'm not the person saying so; it's the Speaker of the House who has written the RCMP to instruct them as such. Why are we even reading this testimony, which would not even have been admissible in the decision the RCMP made?
On December 11th, 2007. See this statement in context.