Two years, probably.
That resulted, in part, from an audit we did, I believe, in the Office of the Correctional Investigator Canada, where no one actually wanted to assume the responsibility of saying they were the chief financial officer—probably for good reason in that case, as there were some untoward transactions. The committee members who were around then will remember this. After that, there was a clarification made to the policy so that every department and agency had to designate quite clearly a chief financial officer, and that chief financial officer obviously had to be aware of his or her responsibilities.
That was certainly a good response, in part, to the problems we saw in that audit.