Let me go to your points. I think we're all in agreement that the mandate of this audit was on process and was to understand how the appointments process for Governor in Council is working.
Let me give you an example, if I can, from my letter to you. It's at the bottom of the first page. The concern we raised was that the audit report included in its analysis of vacancies two organizations that were actually under mandate review by the governor and Government of Canada. Ministerial discretion was actually exercised to decide what they wanted to do with the mandates of those departments. That's not a process issue about whether the process is transparent and what have you. The government was deciding whether for those two or three, which are referenced in the report, they should change it and were holding in abeyance decisions on appointments during that period of time.
This is an example--as I both indicated in my letter and said in my remarks--of elements concerning which we thought the audit strayed from the process per se.