We haven't done a lot of thinking at this point. The senior ADM was appointed Friday. But in my mind, the first steps in any good analysis would look at the models, would dissect the models, would draw out what I would call common trends, elements that seem to be compatible from one model to another. It would look at the pros and cons, and Madam Fraser is right—and it's not easy to do that—it would then transfer this to a Canadian context. What are the adjustments? What are the legal impediments? What are the legal requirements?
Colleagues, I say that again, it looks like “why does it take so much time?” To get it right, to do it correctly, the analysis is a substantial piece of work. Then things will emerge out of the analysis that will be a bit more obvious to many, but it starts with a good analysis where you dissect the systems that are in place, pros and cons, how does it work, what are the pressure points—and adjustments vis à vis our Canadian reality, because we are different in some ways from other Westminster models, even if we have at the core the very same elements.