Mr. Chair, I'm just trying to find the exact place where we talked about the relevant documents, but again in general the agreement called for the federal government to provide all relevant documents. But the agreement did not define “relevant”, and so the government itself made its own decision about what was relevant. As we noted in 6.21:
...the search focused on documents related to policies, operations, and funding for residential schools in general and on documents related to each of the schools named in the Agreement.
That was what the government finally decided was the definition of “relevant.” Now, we also go on to say in 6.23 that even though they had made that definition they did not share it with the commission until much later.
I think that's where there was probably a difference maybe between some of the documents expected and the documents provided.