You did have a conversation with a number of agriculture commodity groups, I guess. I'm a little familiar with it, and in all my time here I've never heard this come up as an issue.
To go back, you say:
For example, a $44,000 excess moisture initiative was delivered in a total of 228 days, while the largest, at $150 million, took less than half that time.
We're talking about the wet, which mostly is about really bad weather, that takes it beyond what insurance would cover and into a disaster program.
I'm wondering what was said in terms of disease and drought, in terms of your assessment of the time. If you're in the agriculture field, actually, and if you have disease and drought, it's understandable that the assessment time will be quite a bit longer. There has to be an evaluation, I believe, with the crop insurance to see what impact that disease or that drought may have had on the yield of the crop.
I'm trying to understand the justification that both the province and the federal government are telling you, through the commodity organizations, that this is excessive. I'm wondering if there is a reason for that, just based on the comments I've made.