In the case you're discussing, I addressed this a bit earlier, but if my answer was unclear, I'll say there was a contract in place with GC Strategies, and officials from the Canada Border Services Agency identified that KPMG could provide some work that would be helpful. Instead of having a contract directly with KPMG, KPMG became a subcontractor for GC Strategies.
Ultimately, we're concerned with the way that happened. The agency was finding the resources for the contractor, and ultimately the government paid too much because GC Strategies ended up getting a finder's fee for that work.