The database I was referring to is one where we actually track contracts awarded. It's so that we can answer as best we can any questions about contract activity and proactive disclosure, etc. The ranking of contractors would be done on a case-by-case basis. When there's a competition, the contractors would bid. There are mandatory requirements: Do you meet them, yes or no? Those who meet the mandatory requirements are then scored on their proposal. There's a ranking on a case-by-case basis.
Public Services and Procurement Canada maintains a regime where any contractors who have been behaving inappropriately are effectively barred from bidding on any government contracts. We obviously would have access to that list and would not award any contracts to anyone or any company on that list.
Do we have a generic ranking of contractors in terms of which ones perform and which ones do not? No, we do not.