The most obvious, Mr. Chair, is his signature on contracts with Dalian after he started his employment with the public service. That's the first part. I believe that during his testimony earlier this week, Mr. Yeo indicated it was an automated signature used by somebody else, but we know Dalian continued to receive contracts.
Mr. Yeo, in his testimony, indicated that he wished he'd been quicker in terms of putting his business interests into a blind trust while at Dalian. However, the important point for me, Mr. Chair, is that he had obligations as an employee. I don't care what he did with his Dalian business; he didn't fulfill his obligation to declare a conflict of interest. As an employee, that was his obligation. He did not meet it. To me, that was cause to pursue termination.