Yes. In fact, I thank Malcolm and the team. I'll point out that the greening government team is a small team of about a dozen people. They, along with the United States, have been co-chairing an international group, a greening government group which they've set up and pioneered with over 50 countries to do this type of sharing.
One of the reasons this takes time is that in many cases, we're developing new methodologies. We want them to be standardized according to international practices. Those are not necessarily all there for governments. That's why we've taken this approach of an international coalition, to move quickly and learn from others, and, frankly, to advance the progress in other countries, as well. That is one of the reasons that one of Malcolm's sidelines is taking questions from other governments, provincial or international, about the best practices we've applied, and similarly trying to learn from them, in terms of what they're doing.
That's one of the reasons this has had to go in steps with the three strategies. Not all of the pieces, including the way to quantify in a viable way scope 3 emissions, were well understood. If we have different governments taking very different approaches to measure this, it will be very difficult from a comparability perspective to know where it's going.
That's been the approach with this learning, and I think we're proceeding well. I completely take the point on speed being of the essence, as the commissioner did. We are trying to move it forward as quickly as we can, but part of that is using international practice to be able to accelerate the work.