Agreed.
At the committee, my colleague from Hamilton Centre asked you this question:
Would you agree that one of the ways to best provide the most amount of clarity around this—because we've now sat through many witnesses, and I'm not sure we have clarity—would be to be included in a public inquiry, should David Johnston, at the end of his special rapporteur position, present that?
At that time, your response was, “I don't think that would be necessary in order to clear the name of the foundation.”
Do you remember that exchange?