No, just as there isn't an exclusively universal definition of scientific knowledge. The social sciences, the humanities, which generate meaning, the physical sciences, the natural sciences and the technological sciences are based on cumulative knowledge and can thus support universal claims. The social sciences, on the other hand, aren't based on cumulative knowledge, but rather explanatory knowledge. They are forms of knowledge that derive from an understanding of societies and their manifestations.
Indigenous knowledge systems have a universal quality in that they are everywhere. The social sciences also have a universal quality in that social sciences are practised differently in Africa, South America and Canada. There are specific characteristics associated with the societal aspect, and that's also true in the indigenous context.
We would like science to be universal—that's one of the claims it makes for itself—but to what extent is science universal, and what scientific disciplines afford us truly universal understanding?