What I'm getting at here is that there has to be a demonstrable value-for-money proposition for the Canadian taxpayer when we're doing this. I understand that basic research is important. It might not necessarily result in something right away, but we have to show that there is translation into the Canadian economy.
Within that broader set of metrics we talked about, should those sorts of things be included in the allocation of research funding, as opposed to non-defined metrics? Do you think that would get more public buy-in for these types of expenditures?