That gets back to the word you heard earlier. It's about capacity within the community. Oftentimes when we get that pushback it's because the communities just aren't prepared and they don't have the capacity to deal with the issues.
I spent 10 years working with the survivors of Indian residential schools. It is a slow process because of the nature of the very issues you're describing. You can't force people to leap ahead in the healing journey when they're not ready, when they're dealing with these kinds of issues.
It really is about helping the communities create the capacity for themselves. In the general policy context we call it place-based or asset-based policy-making, where you really are looking at the ability of the community to move forward. It is the sort of thing we hear oftentimes about seven generations and what not. We are dealing with issues that are going to take an awfully long time for people to work their way through.
You'll also find that it's going to vary across the communities. In my experience, Inuit communities are often much slower on the uptake, slower to get involved in some of these issues than are a lot of first nations communities in the south.
I would offer to the committee that you want to make sure you're not looking at just one singular solution or plan, because it isn't going to work. It has to be varied and reflect the needs and the capacities in the communities.