Evidence of meeting #3 for Status of Women in the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was budget.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clara Morgan  Committee Researcher
Clerk of the Committee  Ms. Danielle Bélisle

4:40 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Yasmin Ratansi

Committee members, should we get the copies of the reports that have been done by the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights?

I just want to know, Madame Boucher, would you have been on the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights? No? Oh, official languages. Okay. Because I just wanted to know if that Sharon McIvor case was ever studied. No? Okay.

If we could look at the reports that have been done by the Standing committees on Canadian Heritage, Justice and Human Rights, and Official Languages and then sieve out what is not relevant to us and say these issues are still relevant to us, and then make a decision, would that be agreeable to move forward?

4:40 p.m.

Bloc

Nicole Demers Bloc Laval, QC

Madam Chair, I suggest that all the committees that have studied the Court Challenges Program—

4:45 p.m.

Conservative

Sylvie Boucher Conservative Beauport—Limoilou, QC

I cannot say when.

4:45 p.m.

A voice

The official languages committee had some.

4:45 p.m.

Conservative

Sylvie Boucher Conservative Beauport—Limoilou, QC

Is that so? I was not aware of that. I did the—

4:45 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Yasmin Ratansi

Does anybody know when this study was completed?

The government would have responded by now for sure.

So we will look at the reports, and if there have been government responses we'll look at them and then we will determine how to move forward with the court challenges program from a woman's perspective.

Yes, Mr. Stanton.

4:45 p.m.

Conservative

Bruce Stanton Conservative Simcoe North, ON

In terms of process, had the prorogation occurred, if the reports had been tabled with the House and a response was pending, would it be up to the new committees to resubmit, or would those responses be forthcoming anyway? In other words, prorogation doesn't affect--

4:45 p.m.

A voice

It's the same session. It's not a new one.

4:45 p.m.

Conservative

Bruce Stanton Conservative Simcoe North, ON

Excellent. Okay, good.

4:45 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Yasmin Ratansi

Any other business?

4:45 p.m.

Bloc

Nicole Demers Bloc Laval, QC

Madam Chair, I would also like to table the following motion: that after reading the reports and everything else, we study the Court Challenges Program.

We have to make motions to get things on the agenda. Therefore, I would like us to study this program and the impact that it had on women, especially on minority women.

4:45 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Yasmin Ratansi

Okay. Have you got that?

4:45 p.m.

The Clerk

It was agreed that after looking at reports from other standing committees, the committee will decide whether it wants to study the court challenges program, focused on women.

4:45 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Yasmin Ratansi

No--“after having reviewed the programs”. Can I paraphrase what you said?

4:45 p.m.

The Clerk

Normally I should get a real written motion, and I'm trying to--

4:45 p.m.

Bloc

Nicole Demers Bloc Laval, QC

Do we have to table a motion here if we want to have something on the agenda? Without a motion, will it not get on the agenda?

4:45 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Yasmin Ratansi

So you are proposing that once the committee has reviewed the three reports, that we be able to look at the angle and see if it deals with the impact on women of the cancellation of the court challenges program?

4:45 p.m.

Bloc

Nicole Demers Bloc Laval, QC

That we study the Court Challenges Program and the impact of its abolition on women's groups, more specifically minorities, which includes first nations women.

We want to do it. We don't want to talk about doing it; we want to do it.

4:45 p.m.

The Clerk

You don't want to see if you want to do it. You want to look at reports and you're doing it no matter what.

4:45 p.m.

Bloc

Nicole Demers Bloc Laval, QC

Yes.

4:45 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Yasmin Ratansi

But you will have a better understanding of it.

Ms. Mathyssen, you had your hand up.

4:45 p.m.

NDP

Irene Mathyssen NDP London—Fanshawe, ON

Yes, Madam Chair.

Two things. One thing, rather mundane, is I'm wondering about this room. It seems very small. I'm wondering if when we begin to have our witnesses we could have a better space and have a little breathing room.

The second thing is that I've been giving some thought with regard to when people come to give testimony about the estimates. And I would like to ask that staff from the regional offices come as part of that so that we can find out how they're managing after a year of closures, in terms of those twelve offices that were closed. Perhaps that could be part of our discussion when we look at the estimates and we ask about how the department is functioning.

4:45 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Yasmin Ratansi

Ms. Mathyssen, if I hear you correctly, afterwards, when we're doing a thorough analysis, we should get the regional office staffs to come?

4:45 p.m.

NDP

Irene Mathyssen NDP London—Fanshawe, ON

Yes. I'd like to hear how they're managing.

4:45 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Yasmin Ratansi

Okay.

Mr. Stanton.