The only thing I would add to what Barb said, in response to the excellent points that were made, is that one of the reasons why we have proposed three key demands that we're trying to orient the pan-Canadian labour movement around is because our pension system is so fragmented. We almost have to approach it that way. It would be great if there was a one-shot deal to fix it, and we do believe the Canada Pension Plan is an enormously powerful vehicle, but the reality is it's not going to help workers aged 58 to 64 who have serious pension needs right now, particularly people whose employers are in bankruptcy, as we're seeing with the Nortel pensioners, the Canwest situation, and AbitibiBowater. That's why we need pension insurance for those folks, so that we have the same priority assessed to people's pensions as we currently do for their homes or their bank deposit accounts or their job with WCB or EI contributions. OAS and GIS are also very important. One has to make, as a senior, less than $11,000 a year to qualify for GIS, and 1.6 million seniors in this country, predominantly women, do. What a statement, in 2009.
So that's why we support that 15%. It will put another $110 in the pockets of low-income seniors per month. If you want to talk about economic stimulus, that's economic stimulus.