No, I'm not trying to do that. OAS and GIS are critical parts of the system for men and women, but they are equal for men and women. I'm trying to look for a mechanism that would compensate women for the fact that they have a higher proportion of their life in unpaid work.
To Mr. Pierlot, I think the proposal to expand the CPP, coupled with moving, say, from 15% to 30%, would by definition improve the situation for women more. But let me ask you, without tying your hands in any way: just overall, if someone asked you what the most effective way would be to compensate women for the fact that they have more years of unpaid work, how would you answer that question?