In terms of the guide, as we always do going into consultations, the one in 2000 and each census look at all the content, so it wasn't just specifically this issue. There are other issues that we raise in the guide, so it's always re-looking at the census content. Is it relevant? Is it producing high-quality information? Is it what users need?
We do that process for every census, and it was no different for the 2011 census.