In the Canadian Human Rights Act, even as a quasi-constitutional statute, there is the non-derogation, non-abrogation provision in our legislation, with the repeal of section 67, and there is provision, as you know, in the interpretive provision, which says that we have to give due regard to legal traditions and customary laws of first nations in any complaint against the first nations.
In some of what we were hearing from the first nations we were meeting with at the time of the repeal of section 67, they were questioning our jurisdiction and saying that even we as an organization—though again, the provision is in there—took away from their aboriginal and treaty rights. My response always was: these are the laws of Canada; if you develop your own system for addressing human rights, we would certainly welcome it, but we continue to be bound to do this, though nothing we can do can abrogate or derogate from rights under the charter and from aboriginal treaty rights.