Great.
First I want to echo the need for a national action plan. I think you've heard that in every meeting. But it can't be designed in isolation, and I don't think it's just up to the federal government to solve this issue. I think the inclusivity piece, the customization to ensure we're reflecting all of the different populations in Canada, is clear.
I think that needs to have a process attached to it, so that everyone is building their capacity to understand the root causes, the solutions, the risks and protective factors, and to understand the solutions. As my colleagues have pointed out, there's a lot of great and amazing work happening in community, getting it captured so it does move into evidence-based portals and so forth. I'm really talking about evidence-informed because things change over time.
I think the inclusivity, the process, is as important as the plan. I monitor all of the government plans all around the world. We have 80. We analyze them. We try to understand what our government is doing, why they are doing it, the evidence on which it is based, and the accountability.
Interestingly, two governments in the world actually monitor and have an accountability framework, where there are actually indicators and measures for which they're responsible. So often we have these wonderful plans that governments put out, but nobody is doing the implementation or is responsible for the implementation, and then nobody is doing the accountability measurement piece.