Thank you very much, gentlemen.
My last question for you is more positive. Art Connolly, of the Agent Orange Association, has been asking for a national public inquiry into what happened in Gagetown. If we had an ombudsman with the proper resources, human and financial, to do a comprehensive so-called inquiry of his own, would that not be a proper way to go, instead of having a public one? For example, it could ease the call, and maybe save money as well, by having an ombudsman with the legislative authority, to go back as far as he or she wanted to go, instead of having a restricted date that thou shall only clean up files, say, from 1990 on. Would you not agree that once they establish the ombudsman position, there's nothing that person, as far back as they want to go, couldn't reach into? Would you agree with that?